On May 21, 2009, the OIG posted an advisory opinion regarding a proposal to compensate physicians for on-call services performed on behalf of it’s uninsured patients. Although the OIG acknowledged the legitimate reasons for such arrangements, they also stated there is a substantial risk that improperly structured payments for on-call coverage could be used to disguise unlawful remuneration. However, the key inquiry is whether the compensation is: (i) fair market value in an arm’s-length transaction for actual and necessary items
Browse Posts by Category
Choose a category below to browse and subscribe to specific content:
Recent Posts
- Don’t Lose Out on the EHR Incentive Dollars: Enrollment in PECOS Required!
- ComplyTrack Risk Assessment Questions Updated!
- OPR Coverage – Is this What we Expected?
- Medical Decision Making – Breaking It Down. Part 1 of 3: Number of Diagnosis & Management Options
- Category III Codes Available for Facet Joint Injections Using Ultrasound Guidance
- Billing for Drug Waste: A Look at the New Modifier – JW
- Pub. 100-22? CMS Issues a New Manual
- FTC Red Flags Enforcement Delayed Again
- Understanding Complex Physician Fee Schedule Changes in 2010
- New Advance Beneficiary Notice Modifiers Effective April 2010
MediBlog - A Resource for the MediRegs User Group. MediBlog was designed to allow you the opportunity to communicate directly with MediRegs specialists as well as colleagues that work in your field of work.


21 weeks 5 days ago
47 weeks 2 days ago
1 year 4 weeks ago
1 year 7 weeks ago
1 year 13 weeks ago
1 year 24 weeks ago
1 year 27 weeks ago
1 year 30 weeks ago
1 year 33 weeks ago