On May 21, 2009, the OIG posted an advisory opinion regarding a proposal to compensate physicians for on-call services performed on behalf of it’s uninsured patients.  Although the OIG acknowledged the legitimate reasons for such arrangements, they also stated there is a substantial risk that improperly structured payments for on-call coverage could be used to disguise unlawful remuneration.  However, the key inquiry is whether the compensation is: (i) fair market value in an arm’s-length transaction for actual and necessary items or services; and (ii) not determined in any manner that takes into account the volume or value of referrals or other business generated between the parties.  In this proposed arrangement, the OIG found safeguards sufficient to reduce the risk that the remuneration was intended to generate referrals of Federal health care program business and concluded it would not subject the hospital to sanctions.

 

 

 

 

Your rating: None Average: 3 (2 votes)

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <b> <p> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h4> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

MediBlog - A Resource for the MediRegs User Group.   MediBlog was designed to allow you the opportunity to communicate directly with MediRegs specialists as well as colleagues that work in your field of work.

Recent Comments / Archives

Disclaimer | Forward-looking Statements | Privacy Statement | © 2007-2012 CCH Incorporated or its affiliates | RSS